Could Hong Kong really become China’s proxy in crypto?

With its partial autonomy, the island metropolis of Hong Kong has historically served as “a gate to China” — the native commerce middle, backed by clear English-style frequent regulation and an overtly pro-business authorities technique. May the harbor, residence to seven million inhabitants, inherit this function in relation to the crypto trade, changing into a proxy for mainland China’s experiments with crypto? 

An impulse to such questioning was given by Arthur Hayes, the previous CEO of crypto derivatives large BitMEX in his Oct. 26 weblog put up. Hayes believes the Hong Kong authorities’s announcement about introducing a bill to regulate crypto to be an indication that China is making an attempt to ease its manner again into the market. The opinion was instantly replicated in a spread of commercial and mainstream media.

Related articles

What occurred

In late October, the top of the fintech unit on the Securities and Futures Fee (SFC) of Hong Kong, Elizabeth Wong, introduced the liberalization of Hong Kong’s regulatory landscape by permitting retail traders to “instantly make investments into digital property.” 

Up till just lately, solely people with a portfolio worth at least $1 million (which marks about 7% of town’s inhabitants) have been granted entry to centralized crypto exchanges by the SFC. The regulator has additionally been reviewing whether or not to permit retail traders to spend money on crypto-related exchange-traded funds, Wong famous.

Roughly a number of days after, on Oct. 21, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Monetary Providers and the Treasury, Christopher Hu, shared his metropolis’s fintech plans, amongst different efforts, directed at “transferring wealth to the following era.” The bottom line is establishing a regulatory regime for digital asset service suppliers, and a sure invoice was already launched to town’s lawmakers, as Hu specified.

Lastly, on Oct. 31, throughout the metropolis’s FinTech Week 2022, Hong Kong Monetary Secretary Paul Chan assured attendees that the digital transformation of monetary companies is a key precedence for his staff. Chan’s colleague, the CEO of the Hong Kong Financial Authority (HKMA), Eddie Yue, promised “radical open-mindedness” concerning the improvements. 

In line with him, the HKMA is within the course of of creating a regulatory regime for stablecoins and has already issued pointers to banks about cryptocurrency or decentralized finance-related companies.

Crackdown on the Mainland, uncertainty on the island

Hong Kong’s intention to open up for crypto comes a 12 months after a devastating crackdown on the trade in Mainland China. Till 2021, the Individuals’s Republic Of China has been having fun with a standing of a world chief in hash fee and cryptocurrency mining. 

Beginning in Might 2021, Chinese language regulators started prohibiting involvement in crypto for monetary establishments, then mining operations and, lastly, the work of exchanges and buying and selling for people. Though that didn’t successfully outlaw the crypto possession as such, any potential for institutional growth of the crypto trade within the nation was frozen.

Again then, Hong Kong officers didn’t verify (or deny) that the island metropolis would adjust to Beijing’s hardline coverage on digital property, however traders however began contemplating their choices.

Latest: How are ‘lite’ versions of crypto apps helping adoption?

Whereas at this time it might sound ironic, in 2021, relocating his headquarters to the Bahamas, Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX was highlighting the significance of long-term regulatory steerage and readability, which Hong Kong laced in his opinion.

This uncertainty took its toll certainly — after attracting $60 billion in crypto between July 2020 and June 2021, Hong Kong began to witness the most important gamers opening up various places of work within the Caribbean or neighboring Singapore. FTX was joined by the likes of, BitMEX and Bitfinex.

The Hayes narrative

Mixing two plot strains — one which traces all an important crypto improvements to China, and the opposite which notes Hong Kong’s historic function because the entry level to communist China — Hayes argued:

“Hong Kong’s pleasant reorientation in direction of crypto portends China reasserting itself within the crypto capital markets.” 

In line with Hayes, Hong Kong authorities can’t diverge too removed from Beijing of their choices, so opening up the crypto market amid the crackdown within the Mainland couldn’t be an autonomous act. 

The rationale behind Beijing’s benevolence to such a U-turn lies within the nervousness of Hong Kong dropping its standing because the principal Asian monetary middle. It has actually faltered throughout the COVID-19 pandemic when the hardline lockdown coverage, exercised in China and Hong Kong, induced an funding escape wave to the neighboring competitor, Singapore, which had eased its restrictions a lot earlier.

One other main issue behind China’s attainable help of Hong Kong’s crypto liberalization, in line with Hayes, is the previous’s drawback with a large United States greenback commerce proficit. Traditionally, like virtually any nation on this planet, China has been storing greenback earnings in property like U.S. Treasury bonds.

However the instance of Russia, whose overseas property have been blocked as a consequence of monetary sanctions after an invasion of Ukraine, has anxious Chinese language officers. Therefore, it’s extremely possible they might search one other sort of asset wherein to retailer their USD earnings. Cryptocurrencies and associated monetary merchandise may be the choice.

Actuality verify

Chatting with Cointelegraph, David Lesperance, founding father of Lesperance & Associates regulation agency, who has been coping with Hong Kon and China-based shoppers for greater than 30 years, doubted the attainable curiosity of the Chinese language authorities in opening as much as crypto:

“Slightly, they’re all for having full management over their inhabitants, together with those that reside in HK. That is demonstrated by such actions as social credit score scoring, facial recognition, family registration, exit bans, zero COVID-19, and many others.” 

Placing crypto apart, latest years have seen tightening political, cultural and financial management of China over Hong Kong with the nationwide safety regulation of 2020 sweeping the earlier civil freedoms away, a change at school curricula to emphasise the Chinese language historical past of the area and the continuing integration of Mainland firms into the island’s juridical house. 

These indicators of the shortening distance between the Mainland and Hong Kong would possibly entice the eye of worldwide regulators. As one banker said to CNN just lately, “The worst situation is that the West would deal with Hong Kong as the identical because the Mainland China, after which Hong Kong would undergo the sort of sanctions.”

The elephant within the room is China’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) mission. The fast growth of the digital yuan (often known as e-CNY) and the ban on crypto is hardly a coincidence. As Ariel Zetlin-Jones, affiliate professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon College’s Tepper College of Enterprise, instructed Cointelegraph again in 2021, in the aftermath of the crackdown:

“China clearly needs to advertise the digital Yuan. Eradicating its rivals by banning crypto actions is a method to do that so it appears cheap to contemplate this motivation as one rationale for his or her insurance policies.”

The digital yuan grew to become essentially the most actively transacted foreign money in a latest six-week m-Bridge pilot of cross-border funds among the many digital currencies issued by central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates. As state-owned Chinese language media noted after the experiment, “Hong Kong [is] poised to be a vibrant middle for e-CNY’s use in worldwide commerce.”

Latest: Breaking down FTX’s bankruptcy: How it differs from other Chapter 11 cases

Lesperance emphasised that the introduction of e-CNY and the persevering with restrictions on the remainder of the crypto, even in terms of home miners, confirms Beijing’s drive to regulate the monetary sphere within the first place:

“Management over the monetary lives and property of the Chinese language residents is the last word management. This can be achieved when all transactions are carried out in e-yuan. Facilitating different crypto-currencies would undermine this transfer towards full management.”