Optimism’s freshly launched governance token, OP, has plunged 40% since peaking at $2.10, main members of the neighborhood to debate baring those that dumped their tokens from future airdrops.
Cointelegraph reported on Tuesday that the Ethereum layer-2 scaling resolution was overwhelmed with demand for the primary OP governance token airdrop, as 5% of the token provide was distributed to round 250,000 eligible customers.
As per CoinGecko information, the token opened at roughly $1.43 earlier than surging to $2.10, however as extra customers received their arms on the free airdrop over the day, OP dropped to as little as $1.09 earlier than climbing again to $1.18 on the time of writing, marking a 43% drop.
Yesterday was an absolute whirlwind. It wasn’t with out hiccups, however to a lot pleasure, OP was born. ‿
We’ll have an intensive retro on Drop Day subsequent week. In the meantime, we need to share some stats popping out of the launch.
With >50% of Drop 1 now claimed, let’s dive in! pic.twitter.com/oGnxB47E3f
— Optimism (✨_✨) (@optimismPBC) June 1, 2022
Following the sharp drop of OP’s worth, a member of Optimism’s governance neighborhood who goes by OxJohn put forward a proposal within the Optimism governance discussion board to exclude addresses that dumped 100% of their airdropped tokens. The publish garnered a big quantity of consideration from the neighborhood, pulling in 11,200 views, 305 replies and 595 likes.
OxJohn highlighted a number of addresses that acquired a minimum of 32,000 OP tokens and promptly dumped them available on the market, arguing that their actions are “counter-productive” to the neighborhood and diluted the governance course of.
The OP hodler went on to counsel that these accounts needs to be barred from the following spherical of OP airdrops with “a public listing of accounts that have interaction on this habits” excluded. Of their view, doing so would see the distribution of governance weight to solely those that plan to actively take part.
“Why ought to Optimism Collective proceed rewarding these sort of mercenary actors who will dump their tokens on first sight? Why ought to any future airdrops reward these addresses?”
The proposal was submitted purely for concepts and suggestions and isn’t near the stage of being voted on. The response from the governance neighborhood has been blended to this point. Some customers had been in full help, others rejected the thought completely, and a few had been calling for a extra nuanced place.
Consumer Mohammedt75 mentioned, “Very legitimate factors. Incentivize individuals who care about the long run and let others who don’t care in regards to the ecosystem pack and get out.”
Mgomes acknowledged that “one of many objectives of the airdrop is to incentivize individuals to make use of the chain. Even when they plan to dump it’s positive, as a result of they’ve used Optimism and in the event that they appreciated the chain they’ll maintain utilizing it.“
Member JustinMarx additionally highlighted an attention-grabbing counterpoint, stating that dumpers shouldn’t be penalized as “you by no means know the non-public circumstances of somebody who dumped their tokens.”
The proposal to punish $OP airdrop dumpers by excluding them from future airdrops is a few Paraswap shit lol. Sure go punish the one folks that have used your chain. Be certain that they go straight to your competitor Arbitrum and by no means come again.
— NoSleepJon (@nosleepjon) June 1, 2022
One of the vital high-profile Crypto Twitter customers to weigh in was Cobie, the co-host of the UpOnly crypto podcast who has practically 700,000 followers. He responded to the proposal in his typical satirical/mocking method.
Cobie submitted a prolonged counter-proposal within the discussion board titled “Extended ineligibility for future airdrops” that was quickly eliminated as a consequence of being flagged as “inappropriate” however has since been reinstated.
In it, he mentioned that “my lack of help for this proposal will not be as a result of I disagree with the sentiment. Quite the opposite, it’s as a result of this proposal doesn’t go far sufficient.”
“I suggest that we, Optimism Collective, cancel the longer term airdrops of anybody that has bought any token within the final 6 months. These individuals have a sample of undesirable habits, we will contemplate them ‘potential future sellers’.”
To counter potential future sellers, Cobie urged issuing them with a debt token and likewise contemplating using “bodily violence” in opposition to them.
The publish that *legitimately suggests banning sellers* is allowed on the Optimism discussion board.
However a parody of that publish is offensive, abusive and a violation of neighborhood tips and might be deleted.
Thanks for the recollections. pic.twitter.com/Ru0oFnZufw
— Cobie (@cobie) June 1, 2022
Nevertheless, after being prompted to offer a extra critical response to the proposal, Cobie highlighted a number of explanation why he thinks that it’s a foul concept.
He made factors equivalent to OP’s early worth being irrelevant, sellers having completely different motives, the chance to promote and nonetheless have interaction with governance, the token getting used as a part of buyer acquisition prices from Optimism, and the convenience of creating a brand new tackle to keep away from restrictions.
“The one folks that care are price-speculators, merchants and short-term traders. Governance definitely performs the identical whether or not the value is $1.50 or $2. Positive, in depth worth adjustments may make governance assaults on Optimism cheaper, however there’s not a single point out of that within the preliminary proposal.”
“And it isn’t actually a priority given the scale of the airdrop or the short-term nature of the sell-pressure from ‘prompt dumpers’,” he added.
— Cobie (@cobie) June 1, 2022